Starting for the abstract, the words X-ray diffraction, increase my interest. Lest to read the complete article! Yes, it talks about Synchrotrons, about brilliant sources, cites the X-FEL, and the experiment was carried in Spring-8 (the highest electron energy synchrotron and the most brilliant x-ray source).
In the article also has mention the effect of the radiation dose to the sample. Yes, the live structures doesn't like the radiation, but you need this light to see it. It seems a contradiction, but the way to do it is to reduce the exposition time that the sample has. A fast shutter is important, and now I understand better why I need to work for a ~1ms fast shutter for the NCD beamline. Reduce the exposition time of the sample to the x-rays to the exact time that the SAXS detector is available.
Uau! Here they talk about the improvement that can be the xfel use and a ultrafast pulses of <= 25 femtoseconds. This can allow more energetic dose during less time, but probably this relation is not linear. I say, more energy means much less time.
No comments:
Post a Comment