Recently have started in Spain a debate about change the time zone to recover the one used when the republic. I think, it's curious that I didn't heard since now about this change. I know that Greenwich meridian cuts the territory and even that we are not in the same zone than England (UK). But it was forgotten to mention to me by anyone that before it was.
According to what I have heard this days, was during the second world war, when the nazi German invade France, they have changed the time zone of France (who where also at Greenwich) to set the same than the invader and the Spanish dictator waved his ally changing the Spanish also.
So far so good? Up to this point there is nothing else in the matter of set back the time zone or not. Every year we change from winter time to summer time and vice-versa, with caring about time zone business.
But the justification I have heard to support this change I think is point less. You can read in the press, that this will help to improve productivity, or that the siesta have the will be gone, or that this will improve working habits...
This is not the solution on the working habits at all! How can think that if some one that is working from 8am to 7pm, will change its work time schedule if politicians change the time zone? The only effect on the change of the time zone, will be that the sun will shift the rise and the set, but will not point the real problem of the Spanish productivity. The exampled journey will be tagged between 7am to 6pm, that is useless for working habits!
There is a brain fire recorded thing in Spain: it is not much important how much you work, the important thing is how much hours are you at work (how much seems that you work). And this is the issue about the working habits and the productivity. Many bosses likes to see you heating the chair and they don't like to see you being the first that leave the office in the evening (even if you have been the first to arrive).
Until this issue is not fix, the working habits will still be bad... In this country, what the boss expect from you, is to see you doing unpaid extra-hours even if you don't have anything to do. And never thing in register those hours, I've work with a time clock machine than automatically signs you off after the 8 hours even if you are still in the office. If you do that, the boss will be happy with you, if you work hard but you don't stay more (except when something really unexpected happen) you will be classified as "not very committed to the project".
Once I had a boss that told me: "we don't want workers that only does eight hours". Put the time zone you want, if the origin of this sentence is not fixed, the balancing between work and family time will be lopsided hopeless...
In other European countries, there are companies points you an assistant when you trigger overtime alarms, to help you to organize your time or detect if you are overloaded.
Showing posts with label general. Show all posts
Showing posts with label general. Show all posts
2013/09/28
2012/02/02
Work from home or what you like
Today, due to the snow in the vicinity, the loudspeakers in Alba's facility have order an unscheduled shutdown of the machine and its beamlines. All the workers had to left the building to go home. Further information to the workers will be sent by email.
Situation like that had happen the past 8th of March in 2010 (picture taken @ 15:12):
It's not usual to have snow in the area of Barcelona, but the pictures are very similar. I hope we will not live the chaos of 2010. We would had to learn something...
Update 20120203: Finally the snow wasn't chaotic. Even that the photos are very similar, in 2010 the picture has been taken at the time when the storm went to worse. It was the beginning. After 1 hour the storm was harder, and at 2 hour huge transport problems collapse communications.
Yesterday, the picture has been take when, after we saw, the maximum of the precipitation. At midday, the news says that in the afternoon would have something like an storm. But the clouds went throw the sea, with any other problem for the people.
We've been lucky this time. You only know if it's overreacting or underreacting when you look it from the future. But if you have to choose, it's better to decay to overreact than underreact.
2011/10/13
Dennis Ritchie
A few days a go, a Very Important Person in the computers world have died. Even that the news has been talk only about an Important Person, and many people can think the Steve Jobs have made a revolution in computers, Dennis Ritchie, in my opinion, have more important goals to receive the "very" in the vip status.
Without his work on Unix (and previously on Multics) together with Ken Thompson and Brian Kerninghan, the Mac operation system wouldn't be possible. Yes it's true that Mac have had many good ideas on usability, but it has many lines written in C, a high level programming language designed by Ritchie and the contribution, again, of Kerninghan. Almost all the computer scientist have on mind Kernighan&Ritchie, and the ones who doesn't probably have problem.
Without his work on Unix (and previously on Multics) together with Ken Thompson and Brian Kerninghan, the Mac operation system wouldn't be possible. Yes it's true that Mac have had many good ideas on usability, but it has many lines written in C, a high level programming language designed by Ritchie and the contribution, again, of Kerninghan. Almost all the computer scientist have on mind Kernighan&Ritchie, and the ones who doesn't probably have problem.
2011/08/05
Looking back, four years from now
In last June, this blog have made 4 years, I'm really sad that is not walking the way I thought.
From the last two years I am not writing much about the main goals of this blog. Like the name says this has been think to post information about cryptology and about synchrotron related stuff (this partially more in general about the physics I'm learning due to my job, but also write about software engineering on my job). At least I have wrote this way in the second post. I remember when I wrote the first one.
But looking back, the fact is that the events in the job are not the best to focus on development. From the smallest to the biggest. From the macroeconomic to daily work. From the global crisis and the particular situation of Spain to the lasts incidents that happens at work.
What the hell!! Cannot be the things easier? Is not possible to live in peace? Dedicating the efforts in what makes work funy.
In Alba, the head of Experiments division "decided to stop activity": complicated way to say in an email that he will left Alba next September. In the "good bye" email, with the cold subject "information" (reflects a lot the behaviour of the workers at this institution) he have mention many times the word "reputation".
Next years will be crucial for this synchrotron reputation. I have a similar opinion, but a bit different perspective.
Yes, the Alba's reputation is made by many individual users who come to perform experiments. The effort of all the workers will make the users happy and they will comeback and tell they colleges about how good the work is done here.
And also there is motivation. Motivation of the workers to do our best. But since the last years this is becoming difficult. We succeed in linac start up in 2008, then comes the booster and after the storage, this year the beamlines commissioning. But there are "individuals" who have capacity to break this good environment. Specially the people how are upper in the hierarchy, they have more public skills. And they broke it.
By today, the company has been demanded in the trial for it's attitude against the workers unions. About the acts that some one in the management has made to threatening the workers. This action is not what brakes the environment, this is the consequence of an aggressive attitude subtended in time. A long time, years.
Don't believe them when they say: then the victim reports the assault is injuring the reputation of the institution. It's a very bad excuse and it criminalizes the victim to say that has been harm.
The directors of the cells consortium (and the LLS and the ST -4, another society in the Alba's area) have done many actions that disturbs the environment. Since I start to work here I have seen many situations of power abuse. Under the umbrella of this happens from time to time and you have to be aware and as far from him that you can work, the better. We have lost many good workers. There are examples of fired people, and many are people who left Alba as fast as possible to go to "better" places (meaning better by anywhere, but many to the ITER and its European corp). And all of them have a very good background and skills. They were very big losses. We suffer it.
The president of this institution has been kept inform of this events. He has been informed of the unpleasant situations with out acting to protect the workers. I think he is more interested in the reputation perspective from outside. If this news didn't go outside, to the public opinion, to the end-users, they are not important. Is not important if a worker is intimidated, the important thing is that no body else would know that.
I don't think as a good plan for reputation, when someone is attacked, try to silent the victim. This doesn't fix the problem, this would happen again, and it happens many times.
Having the people afraid to be vexed (or fired as a better situation) is not a way to make reputation on an institution. This is the way to have the people busy searching for a job somewhere else.
From the last two years I am not writing much about the main goals of this blog. Like the name says this has been think to post information about cryptology and about synchrotron related stuff (this partially more in general about the physics I'm learning due to my job, but also write about software engineering on my job). At least I have wrote this way in the second post. I remember when I wrote the first one.
But looking back, the fact is that the events in the job are not the best to focus on development. From the smallest to the biggest. From the macroeconomic to daily work. From the global crisis and the particular situation of Spain to the lasts incidents that happens at work.
What the hell!! Cannot be the things easier? Is not possible to live in peace? Dedicating the efforts in what makes work funy.
In Alba, the head of Experiments division "decided to stop activity": complicated way to say in an email that he will left Alba next September. In the "good bye" email, with the cold subject "information" (reflects a lot the behaviour of the workers at this institution) he have mention many times the word "reputation".
Next years will be crucial for this synchrotron reputation. I have a similar opinion, but a bit different perspective.
Yes, the Alba's reputation is made by many individual users who come to perform experiments. The effort of all the workers will make the users happy and they will comeback and tell they colleges about how good the work is done here.
And also there is motivation. Motivation of the workers to do our best. But since the last years this is becoming difficult. We succeed in linac start up in 2008, then comes the booster and after the storage, this year the beamlines commissioning. But there are "individuals" who have capacity to break this good environment. Specially the people how are upper in the hierarchy, they have more public skills. And they broke it.
By today, the company has been demanded in the trial for it's attitude against the workers unions. About the acts that some one in the management has made to threatening the workers. This action is not what brakes the environment, this is the consequence of an aggressive attitude subtended in time. A long time, years.
Don't believe them when they say: then the victim reports the assault is injuring the reputation of the institution. It's a very bad excuse and it criminalizes the victim to say that has been harm.
The directors of the cells consortium (and the LLS and the ST -4, another society in the Alba's area) have done many actions that disturbs the environment. Since I start to work here I have seen many situations of power abuse. Under the umbrella of this happens from time to time and you have to be aware and as far from him that you can work, the better. We have lost many good workers. There are examples of fired people, and many are people who left Alba as fast as possible to go to "better" places (meaning better by anywhere, but many to the ITER and its European corp). And all of them have a very good background and skills. They were very big losses. We suffer it.
The president of this institution has been kept inform of this events. He has been informed of the unpleasant situations with out acting to protect the workers. I think he is more interested in the reputation perspective from outside. If this news didn't go outside, to the public opinion, to the end-users, they are not important. Is not important if a worker is intimidated, the important thing is that no body else would know that.
I don't think as a good plan for reputation, when someone is attacked, try to silent the victim. This doesn't fix the problem, this would happen again, and it happens many times.
Having the people afraid to be vexed (or fired as a better situation) is not a way to make reputation on an institution. This is the way to have the people busy searching for a job somewhere else.
2011/01/27
General strike 27G
Usually I don't write this type of things in this blog, but today I'll do an exception (Like I did when we had protests in the synchrotron). In the future we will see if this is only an exception (looking on the "politics" tag). I hope I am no digging my grave.
Today is general strike in some regions of Spain (Euskadi, Nafarroa, Galiza, Balearic islands, and Catalunya) organized by some syndicalist organizations. In the case of Catalonia: CGT Catalunya, CNT Catalunya, COS and Solidaridad Obrera. I have to say: they are not the majority in workers union organizations in Catalunya.
The announcement of this strike has been silenced by the mass media. Yes, I say that because in the "main" tv news and the paper press, I saw almost anything about this strike. As an example, in the Catalonian tv, in the news I saw last Saturday (non web accessible) they told about an okupation (squat) in an abandoned cinema building. They explain that the police had to remove them due to some similitude with the squat of a building, a few days before the general strike of the 29th of September (2010), without telling "there's an strike planned for the 27th" until the last second of the report.
Today the video they have public is more impartial they explain the thing more in a fifty fifty way. But this was not what the people saw at the first moment that this happen. Also they publish another video about the Catalonian (new) government announcing a zero tolerance in the squatting. Even of the big problem we had in this country last months the government did not say anything about zero tolerance in politics corruption, police, or companies. A citizen can go more days to jail for being in a protest than for million euros corruption.
What the government announce yesterday is the derogation of an internal police rule about ethics. The reason: we can trust in our police. Then we can remove all the laws, because we can trust in our citizens. People is ideal! People is great from nature. I don't thing it's easy to be a cop, but without rules for them weird things happen. Why to remember all the press to dress the distinguish with a bracelet? Do I have to dress another bracelet telling the police that I am a good citizen?
The Spanish mass media are talking about Egyptian, Tunisian and Yemen protests. In local news they don't talk about any type of protest, only they explain the agreement about the prolongation of the age of retirement, even if this is the reason of the general strike of today, they don't talk about strike. In Europe we even don't have media information about Iceland revolution.
We cannot discuss the official speech. If you are not agree about what the capitalism and neoliberalism, the only option they give you is to be excluded of the system, to be against the system. With what is happening on this crisis, the best thing they can tell about the people is that the are anti-capitalist.
2010/12/15
Wikileaks pursuit
There is a lot of information about the wikileaks pursuit on the web. Just I read this funny comic.
Don't kill the messenger. After Wikileaks revelations, it seems that the problem is when secret information is shown. The problem is that the citizens are able to have proves of what we suspect: too many times our democratic representatives lie us. This informations, with many more revelations, are the final proof that they lie on purpose!
Don't kill the messenger. After Wikileaks revelations, it seems that the problem is when secret information is shown. The problem is that the citizens are able to have proves of what we suspect: too many times our democratic representatives lie us. This informations, with many more revelations, are the final proof that they lie on purpose!
2008/09/11
recicling photographed conference slides
I'm reading in the Nature of last week (September, 4th) about the nervousness of some scientist with the colleges that goes to a conference and takes photos with digital cameras and uses the data for their own publications.
I cannot definitely understand this position. The first ones, the lecturers are presenting some data in public and they can have the title of the first of publish it. At the same time this can be used as a base of the next publication upgrade, or to find any mistake that exists.
In this second possibility, imagine that in this PAMELA presentation they announce the dark matter detection (implies existence) with a mistaken proves that no one in the conference can study because of their obscurity. I'm not saying they should did mistakes, I'm saying not other scientist can check it. Yes, they like to review with some other colleges chosen by themselves, but this doesn't mean publish.
If they don't trust a 100% to their study why they publish it? Because no one else publish it before but saving the dress if they made a mistake? Oh, please! This have more sense in politics, or some where than the only important think is naming. There is no price for the second who discover dark matter, I understand it. But what happens if another scientist team is closer to the verified results and publish it; will this ones says 'they copy it from us' with an ultra-hidden camera in the conference?
Actualization: Reading more about this column in Nature, I understand the problem is more because the copyright of many publications than specifically because the scientist doesn't like it. Many times the slides are published after the conference, but the problem can come when the journals decides which data can be publish out them. How is the owner of the investigations?
I cannot definitely understand this position. The first ones, the lecturers are presenting some data in public and they can have the title of the first of publish it. At the same time this can be used as a base of the next publication upgrade, or to find any mistake that exists.
In this second possibility, imagine that in this PAMELA presentation they announce the dark matter detection (implies existence) with a mistaken proves that no one in the conference can study because of their obscurity. I'm not saying they should did mistakes, I'm saying not other scientist can check it. Yes, they like to review with some other colleges chosen by themselves, but this doesn't mean publish.
If they don't trust a 100% to their study why they publish it? Because no one else publish it before but saving the dress if they made a mistake? Oh, please! This have more sense in politics, or some where than the only important think is naming. There is no price for the second who discover dark matter, I understand it. But what happens if another scientist team is closer to the verified results and publish it; will this ones says 'they copy it from us' with an ultra-hidden camera in the conference?
Actualization: Reading more about this column in Nature, I understand the problem is more because the copyright of many publications than specifically because the scientist doesn't like it. Many times the slides are published after the conference, but the problem can come when the journals decides which data can be publish out them. How is the owner of the investigations?
2008/07/23
Take a look in another place
For a long time I read many things (It doesn't mean I understand it) about the supersymmetry as an explanation of many of the biggest questions in physics. The supersymmetric particles can explain the problem of the matter quantity in the universe. This problem is simple, the universe has to have more matter than we saw to be like we saw.
Today I read a post about a different way to find this undiscovered matter. Many time I read about astrophysical ways to try to see something in the sky. But this time is different, we like to try to create this matter as a collision result in the way to know if this can exist in this universe.
Deeper read about this type of matter, I think, can be the Wikipedia's article about neutralinos. Also there is in spanish a really good writter, who wrote about the amazin world of the particles.
Today I read a post about a different way to find this undiscovered matter. Many time I read about astrophysical ways to try to see something in the sky. But this time is different, we like to try to create this matter as a collision result in the way to know if this can exist in this universe.
Deeper read about this type of matter, I think, can be the Wikipedia's article about neutralinos. Also there is in spanish a really good writter, who wrote about the amazin world of the particles.
2008/06/27
Just for an hour
Yesterday my mobile dies. Dies suddenly and fast. The mobile agonizes during hours until I decide to go to a mobile-shop to acquire the substitute... Just like an hour after this action, a friend announced me the Neo FreeRunner release.
Rage...
Rage...
2008/06/07
Quantum thermodynamics
I read a post really interesting, the writer sometimes write good thing and I have this blog on the aggregator. Many times, on quantum mechanics (that I have less than a poor idea) you read something that breaks you schemas of who the world works.
In the reference that the blogger says also a reference to a Nature's article is said. But without an specific link. Still worst, they say recently reported but I need to go to the Nature's number 452 published the April 10th of 2008. But if you read when the article was received on the publication (October 18th 2007) and when it was approved (February 26th 2008), the recenly addquires much more sense.
In the reference that the blogger says also a reference to a Nature's article is said. But without an specific link. Still worst, they say recently reported but I need to go to the Nature's number 452 published the April 10th of 2008. But if you read when the article was received on the publication (October 18th 2007) and when it was approved (February 26th 2008), the recenly addquires much more sense.
2008/05/06
Bad news from Great Britain
I read this article that is funny at the beginning because the author wrote the typical comparison of a synchrotron building to a donut. Also the first paragraph is good because some of the main reasons for the synchrotron existence are described (but there are others more). This tools are not made only to do the physicist busy and playing their toys, this building has something to produce in the society.
After years of people doing a bet on this infrastructure, many people can be forced to restart their specialization. Yes, because they have two options: work in another thing or move out the country. This type of job is really specialized. An accelerators physicist, or a protein crystallographic scientist can not be moved fast and easily to another type of job.
I understand, bad times would come, but the bad point is when science is becoming an exchange money. Badly is when everything can be explained by the bad times, good and bad maneuvers. Only insist in take care, read much and compare and contrast the information you have. Put it in doubt and create your opinion.
After years of people doing a bet on this infrastructure, many people can be forced to restart their specialization. Yes, because they have two options: work in another thing or move out the country. This type of job is really specialized. An accelerators physicist, or a protein crystallographic scientist can not be moved fast and easily to another type of job.
I understand, bad times would come, but the bad point is when science is becoming an exchange money. Badly is when everything can be explained by the bad times, good and bad maneuvers. Only insist in take care, read much and compare and contrast the information you have. Put it in doubt and create your opinion.
2008/04/29
Čerenkov radiation (II)
Just a brief note about the Čerenkov radiation, that it was already mentioned here. I found photos of this blue water in a German neutron research facility.
2008/04/19
Higgs field
In this moment when I am compiling my compiler, I am reading something about the Higgs field in 'Investigación y Ciencia' (the two months delayed Spanish version of Scientific American). With the sentence "In quantum theory, quantities such as mass are not set once and for all but are modified by quantum effects.", from the article "The incoming revolutions in particle physics", an interesting point came back to my mind.
There are many places where you can read, for example this article, from where the mass can come or if the mass is from the particle itself or it is a result with the Higgs field. But what came back was the question why the values of the mass are this ones and not another ones. Are they arbitrary selected or it has a reason.
As far as I can understand from this article, the Higgs boson mass/energy has to have a big relation with this values. Correct me if I am wrong but this should be one of the reasons why we need to turn on the LHC. The point where I am becoming really disoriented is when they talk about the Technicolor, and how to understand the Higgs is not fundamental itself but is made by a conjunction of pieces that we, probably, already know.
Really huge phenomenons are waiting to be discovered when this machine starts to produce de amazing torrents of data. Believe that Grid will be able to chew this information.
There are many places where you can read, for example this article, from where the mass can come or if the mass is from the particle itself or it is a result with the Higgs field. But what came back was the question why the values of the mass are this ones and not another ones. Are they arbitrary selected or it has a reason.
As far as I can understand from this article, the Higgs boson mass/energy has to have a big relation with this values. Correct me if I am wrong but this should be one of the reasons why we need to turn on the LHC. The point where I am becoming really disoriented is when they talk about the Technicolor, and how to understand the Higgs is not fundamental itself but is made by a conjunction of pieces that we, probably, already know.
Really huge phenomenons are waiting to be discovered when this machine starts to produce de amazing torrents of data. Believe that Grid will be able to chew this information.
Present and past, simultaneous
Did you ever thought to see an evolution in time needs to wait this time? People from the university of Heidelberg (in Germany) saw a pulsar under five different time perspectives at the same time. How to understand this? The explanation is the gravitational lensing.
In 10th April 2008 Nature you can find a short article about this and also in the HubbleSite you can find a good images about this. The source article is from The Astrophysical Journal, but only the abstract is accessible.
As far as I understand, the point is the galaxy in the middle. It curves the light from the quasar that cannot come directly to as (because something is in the middle) an it came from five different paths. The light travels different distances to arrives here, and it means each ways has differences on time scale. They arrive here at the same time, but then they need to start the trip on different moments.
In 10th April 2008 Nature you can find a short article about this and also in the HubbleSite you can find a good images about this. The source article is from The Astrophysical Journal, but only the abstract is accessible.
As far as I understand, the point is the galaxy in the middle. It curves the light from the quasar that cannot come directly to as (because something is in the middle) an it came from five different paths. The light travels different distances to arrives here, and it means each ways has differences on time scale. They arrive here at the same time, but then they need to start the trip on different moments.
2007/09/09
Čerenkov radiation
After a couple of days out of service, and without write here, I am back to continue. Time that I have no write, but time that I read much things. Too much thing, that I create a directory in my bookmarks to remember every thing that I want to comment here.
To day is the day that I want to shape here my impression about the Čerenkov radiation. Because I am working in a place where the radiation is important, and this knowledge is interesting for the workers to be safety, I want information.
First of all I need to say, when I read the Wikipedia article about the Čerenkov radiation, I thought if the idea to paint the electrons in blue could have any relation. I don't know if this is common, but in my imagintation the electrons are always little blue spheric balls. Furthermore to the strings theory here my sphere idea is wrong in pro of a string loop vibrating on an eleven dimension world, the colouring idea is also wrong in practice because the blue colour is a photon wavelength of 475nm (like 49'6eV), and the electron is another kind of particle where the colour like we can see have no sense.
But did you ever read something about the quark colours? Really interesting to know something about why they use colours in a too small world where the colours as we say have no sense! (Danger of side splitting through laughter about the anticolours).
At last, why my mean confuse an idea of visible colours characteristic from the electromagnetic boson with in a lepton common particle?
To day is the day that I want to shape here my impression about the Čerenkov radiation. Because I am working in a place where the radiation is important, and this knowledge is interesting for the workers to be safety, I want information.
First of all I need to say, when I read the Wikipedia article about the Čerenkov radiation, I thought if the idea to paint the electrons in blue could have any relation. I don't know if this is common, but in my imagintation the electrons are always little blue spheric balls. Furthermore to the strings theory here my sphere idea is wrong in pro of a string loop vibrating on an eleven dimension world, the colouring idea is also wrong in practice because the blue colour is a photon wavelength of 475nm (like 49'6eV), and the electron is another kind of particle where the colour like we can see have no sense.
But did you ever read something about the quark colours? Really interesting to know something about why they use colours in a too small world where the colours as we say have no sense! (Danger of side splitting through laughter about the anticolours).
At last, why my mean confuse an idea of visible colours characteristic from the electromagnetic boson with in a lepton common particle?
2007/07/05
This is alive
I have been some days very busy and this blog has come of a little forgotten. By the way I didn't publish this blog to many people, then I must not have many readers.
Long time a go, one friend insist, again and again, that it could be interesting that I wrote a blog. I never take seriously this idea, but a student opportunity to go to Svalbard moves me to change the opinion and it becomes the begin of this project.
I am preparing to write something more interesting.
Long time a go, one friend insist, again and again, that it could be interesting that I wrote a blog. I never take seriously this idea, but a student opportunity to go to Svalbard moves me to change the opinion and it becomes the begin of this project.
I am preparing to write something more interesting.
2007/06/15
Opening the close season...
This will be my first experience in blogging, but I could be a good moment for me to write something here. Maybe this is the moment.
The idea that I have to write about in this blog is something related with science and something of software engineering. Why? Because I am a worker in a synchrotron, I am a control software engineer in one of this light source machines.
For a long time, I have been searching a job that has some sense. I belive in free software, and I had the dream to pay me bills writing free software. When accidentally I knew there exist some machines in the works that creates their free control software, I thought this could be a good place to work.
Here I will want to explain the things that seems interesting to me about this machines and about my contribution in the control distributed system that governs the machine. "My" machine is under construction, then this could be more interesting because where will appear the full construction process. But not all is created from scratch! This is free software! We base our control system in the one that some other synchrotron use and we became contributors to it. My role is to develop agents to live in this distributed control system.
I will explain more...
The idea that I have to write about in this blog is something related with science and something of software engineering. Why? Because I am a worker in a synchrotron, I am a control software engineer in one of this light source machines.
For a long time, I have been searching a job that has some sense. I belive in free software, and I had the dream to pay me bills writing free software. When accidentally I knew there exist some machines in the works that creates their free control software, I thought this could be a good place to work.
Here I will want to explain the things that seems interesting to me about this machines and about my contribution in the control distributed system that governs the machine. "My" machine is under construction, then this could be more interesting because where will appear the full construction process. But not all is created from scratch! This is free software! We base our control system in the one that some other synchrotron use and we became contributors to it. My role is to develop agents to live in this distributed control system.
I will explain more...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
